Lack of science or bad science?

Authors

  • Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35454/rncm.v2n1.054

Abstract

¿Falta de ciencia o mala ciencia?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ioannidis JPA, Stuart ME, Brownlee S, Strite SA. How to survive the medical misinformation mess. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47:795-802.

van de Grift TC, Kroeze R. Design Thinking as a Tool for Interdisciplinary Education in Health Care. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1234-8.

Ioannidis JP. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94(3):485-514.

Loew LM, Wang DN. Science communication: Quality at stake. Science. 2013;342(6163):1169.

Too many unreliable guidelines. Prescrire Int. 2013;22(139): 164.

Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the “evidence” of “evidence-based medicine”. Am J Med. 1997;103(6):529-35.

Cosgrove L, Bursztajn HJ, Erlich DR, Wheeler EE, Shaughnessy AF. Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(4):674-81.

Kobo-Greenhut A, Notea A, Ruach M, Onn E, Hasin Y. Time to follow guidelines, protocols, and structured procedures in medical care and time to leap out. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:233-7.

Shaughnessy AF, Cosgrove L, Lexchin JR. The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(6):644-8.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-01

How to Cite

Toulson Davisson Correia, M. I. (2019). Lack of science or bad science?. Journal Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, 2(1), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.35454/rncm.v2n1.054

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism: May

Section

Editorials

License

Copyright (c) 2019 M. Isabel T. D. Correia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)