¿Falta de ciencia o mala ciencia?

Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia

doi:10.35454/rncm.v2n1.054

Autores/as

Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35454/rncm.v2n1.054

Resumen

¿Falta de ciencia o mala ciencia?

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Ioannidis JPA, Stuart ME, Brownlee S, Strite SA. How to survive the medical misinformation mess. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47:795-802.

van de Grift TC, Kroeze R. Design Thinking as a Tool for Interdisciplinary Education in Health Care. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1234-8.

Ioannidis JP. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94(3):485-514.

Loew LM, Wang DN. Science communication: Quality at stake. Science. 2013;342(6163):1169.

Too many unreliable guidelines. Prescrire Int. 2013;22(139): 164.

Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the “evidence” of “evidence-based medicine”. Am J Med. 1997;103(6):529-35.

Cosgrove L, Bursztajn HJ, Erlich DR, Wheeler EE, Shaughnessy AF. Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(4):674-81.

Kobo-Greenhut A, Notea A, Ruach M, Onn E, Hasin Y. Time to follow guidelines, protocols, and structured procedures in medical care and time to leap out. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:233-7.

Shaughnessy AF, Cosgrove L, Lexchin JR. The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(6):644-8.