La tricotomía preocupante en la nutrición clínica y su aplicación a los derechos humanos

Albert Barrocas; Diana Cárdenas

doi:10.35454/rncm.v4nSup.320

Autores/as

Albert Barrocas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8506-7244
Diana Cárdenas Universidad El Bosque https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-0307

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35454/rncm.v4nSup.320

Palabras clave:

Bioética, Principialismo, Tecnologia, Apoyo nutricional

Resumen

El soporte nutricional es un gran avance de la medicina que ha permitido alimentar a todos los enfermos que no pueden ser alimentados por vía oral. Durante el desarrollo de tecnologías como esta, la falta de previsión de las cuestiones éticas y legales puede resultar problemática. El autor principal (T3) ha bautizado este enigma como “la tricotomía problemática”.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Barrocas A, Yarbrough G, Becnel PA 3rd, Nelson JE. Ethical and legal issues in nutrition support of the geriatric patient: The can, should, and must of nutrition support. Nutr Clin Pract. 2003;18(1):37-47. doi: 10.1177/011542650301800137

Barrocas A. Nutrition support and the troubling trichotomy: A call to action. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006;21(2):109-12. doi: 10.1177/0115426506021002109

Barrocas A. The troubling trichotomy 10 years later: Where are we now? Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31(3):295-304. doi: 10.1177/0884533616629631

Cárdenas D, Correia MITD, Ochoa JB, Hardy G, Rodríguez-Ventimilla D, Bermúdez CE, et al. Clinical nutrition and human rights. An international position paper. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36(3):534-44. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10667

Cárdenas D. What is clinical nutrition? Understanding the epistemological foundations of a new discipline. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016;11:e63-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2015.10.001

Gewirth A. Reason and morality. University of Chicago Press. 1981.

Jackson-Meyer K. The principle of proportionality: An ethical approach to resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. Bioethics.net. 2020. Consultado el 11 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://www.bioethics.net/2020/04/the-principle-of-proportionality-an-ethical-approach-to-resource-allocation-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Liddell HG, Scott R. A Greek-English lexicon. 7ª edición. New York: Oxford University Press. 1982.

Franssen M, Lokhorst GJ, de Poel IV. Philosophy of technology [Internet]. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. Consultado el 7 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/technology

Technology [Internet]. Cambridge Dictionary. Consultado el 7 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es-LA/dictionary/english/technology

Corbie-Smith G. The continuing legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis study: Considerations for clinical investigation. Am J Med Sci. 1999;317(1):5-8. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199901000-00002

Brandt AM. Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hastings Cent Rep. 1978;8(6):21-9.

Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research [Internet]. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Consultado el 10 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir Care. 2008; 53(10):1325-9.

Grodin MA. Historical origins of the Nuremberg code. En: Annas GJ, Grodin MA (editores). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code: Human rights in human experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1992. p. 121-44.

WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [Internet]. World Medical Association. 2018. Consultado el 14 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

Cárdenas D, Bermúdez CE, Echeverri S, Pérez A, Puentes M, López L, et al. Declaración de Cartagena. Declaración Internacional sobre el derecho al cuidado nutricional y la lucha contra la malnutrición. Nutr Hosp. 2019;36(4):974-80. doi: 10.20960/nh.02701

Cárdenas D, Bermúdez C, Barazzoni R. The Cartagena Declaration: A call for global commitment to fight for the right to nutritional care. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2458-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.07.015

Cárdenas D. La nutrition en médecine: approche épistémologique, problèmes éthiques et cas cliniques. Paris: L´Harmattan. 2020.

Floridi L, Cowls J. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. 2019;1(1). doi: 10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

Sicard D. L’ethique médicale et la bioéthique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 2009.

AMA principles of medical ethics [Internet]. American Medical Association. 2001. Consultado el 1 de abril de 2021.

Disponible en: https://www.ama-assn.org/about/publications-newsletters/ama-principles-medical-ethics

Potter VR. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Pub. 1971.

Luppicini R. Technoethics and the Evolving Knowledge Society: Ethical issues in technological design, research, development, and innovation. Estados Unidos: IGI Global. 2010.

Heidegger M. The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper and Row. 1977.

Jonas H. [edición en inglés] The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 1984.

Maillard N. La vulnérabilité: une nouvelle catégorie morale? Genève: Labor et Fides. 2011.

Cárdenas D, Díaz G, Cadavid J, Lipovestky F, Canicoba M, Sánchez P, et al. Nutrition in medical education in Latin America: Results of cross-sectional survey. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021;1-9. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2107

Crowley J, Ball L, Hiddink GJ. Nutrition in medical education: A systematic review. Lancet Planet Health. 2019;3(9):e379-89. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30171-8

Pelluchon C. Eléments pour une éthique de la vulnérabilité. Les hommes, les animaux, la nature. Paris: CERF. 2011.

Levinas E. Totalité et infini. Paris: Biblio essais. 1971.

Druml C, Ballmer PE, Druml W, Oehmichen F, Shenkin A, Singer P, et al. ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(3):545-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006

Tronto J. Un monde vulnérable, pour une politique du care. Paris: Editions La Découverte. 2009.

Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, Ballmer P, Biolo G, Bischoff SC, et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004

Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, González MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002

Cárdenas D, Deutz NEP. Is the definition of malnutrition a Sisyphean task? Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;29:246-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.10.005

Binet JR. Droit de la bioéthique. Lextenso: Issy les Moulineux. 2017.

ASPEN Nutrition Science & Practice Conference. Poster abstracts. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021;45:S44-S240. Consultado en abril de 2021. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2095

Barrocas A, Cohen ML. Have the answers to common legal questions concerning nutrition support changed over the past decade? 10 questions for 10 years. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31(3):285-93. doi: 10.1177/0884533616644439

Barrocas A, Farquharson J, Fernández M. Legal considerations in nutritional support. Nutr Supp Serv. 1986:6(6):13.

Perry JE, Churchill LR, Kirshner HS. The Terri Schiavo case: legal, ethical, and medical perspectives. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(10):744-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-00012

Hirsch E, Mann JM. Droits de l’homme et respect de la personne. En: Hirsch E (editor). Traité de bioéthique: fondements, principes repères. Toulouse: Eres. 2010. p. 249-61.

Beauchamp TL, Childress FJ. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7ª edición. New York: Oxford University Press. 2012.

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights [Internet]. UNESCO. 2005. Consultado el 1 de abril de 2021. Disponible en: https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/bioethics-and-human-rights

Barrocas A, Schwartz DB, Hasse JM, Seres DS, Mueller CM. Ethical framework for nutrition support resource allocation during shortages: Lessons from COVID-19. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35(4):599-605. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10500

Berlinger N, Wynia M, Powell T, Hester M, Milliken A, Fabi R, et al. Ethical framework for health care institutions responding to novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). 2021. Disponible en: https://www.thehastingscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/HastingsCenterCovidFramework2020.pdf

Guidelines for institutional ethics services responding to COVID-19, managing uncertainty, safeguarding communities, guiding practice [Internet]. The Hastings Center. 2020. Consultado el 16 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://mk0thehastingsc1jg1a.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/HastingsCenterCovidFramework2020.pdf

Ethical framework for decision making in HPC during the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. 2020. Consultado el 16 de junio de 2021. Disponible en: https://www.nhpco.org/wp-content/uploads/COVID-19-Ethical-Framework-Decision-Making.pdf

Habit 5: Seek first to understand then to be understood [Internet]. 10 Minute Leader. 2016. Consultado el 16 de junio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.the10minuteleader.com/habit-5-seek-first-to-understand-then-to-be-understood/